1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to Lightroom Forums! We're a friendly bunch, so please feel free to register and join in the conversation. If you're not familiar with forums, you'll find step by step instructions on how to register and post your first thread under Help on the menubar above. You're also welcome to join our newsletter, download our free Lightroom Quick Start eBook and explore our other FAQ resources.
    Dismiss Notice

Ode to broken workflow

Discussion in 'Workflow Discussion' started by alaios, Dec 19, 2016.

  1. alaios

    alaios Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2014
    Messages:
    339
    Lightroom Experience:
    Beginner
    Primary OS:
    Windows 7 64-bit
    Lightroom Version:
    5.0
    Hi all,
    I am using lightroom to edit mostly my photos. Many times I am using editors that I call inside lightroom.
    That is the imagenomic plugin as well as the exposure X plugins.
    I have noticed that when these external editors "return" me back an edited tiff file, I end up having a files with no more lightroom attributes (stars, color tags) and keywords.

    This is really problematic when I use catalogues to keep my work at one place, for example editing a wedding. The edited tiff files are not any more part of those catalogues and end up unsorted, with no stars, color tags and keywords in the catalogue (that I need considerable amount of time to find those)

    Any ideas what I am doing wrong?
    Alex
     
  2. clee01l

    clee01l Lightroom Guru Staff Member Lightroom Guru

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    12,785
    Location:
    Bellaire, TX USA
    Lightroom Experience:
    Power User
    Primary OS:
    Mac 10.12.x Sierra
    Lightroom Version:
    6.10.1 / CC 2015.10.1
    Lightroom License:
    CC Subscription
    PhotoshopCC is "smart" enough to retain (or add) derivative images into Collection and to maintain metadata (at least it does with LRCC2015.x) . In theory, it should be possible for other editors to do the same. Therefore the problem either must lie with these editors and how they treat metadata or the intermediate file created by your version of LR. D/L a trial of LRCC and see if the edit in functions behaves to preserve your metadata and collections
     

Share This Page